Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:28:03

Author: david kardelis

Subject: Re: Conservation of rotational energy

Post:

--0003255765ae4052b304950ad6d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Conservation of Rotational energy is not the same thing as conservation of
angular momentum, The angular momentum is conserved because there is no Net
external Torque, the energy is not conserved as an external force is acting
through a distance, in particular the tension applied to the bottom of the
sphere, additionally the PE due to gravity of the sphere increases as the
sphere is collapsed

so not Tom-AYE-toe, Tom-AHH-toe.

dave

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, david kardelis wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Scott Thomas
> > wrote:
>
>> Conservation of rotational energy, or conservation of angular momentum?
>> Tom-AYE-toe, Tom-AHH-toe. ;-)
>>
>>
>
>

--0003255765ae4052b304950ad6d3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Conservation of Rotational energy is not the same thing as conservation of =
angular momentum,=A0 The angular momentum is conserved because there is no =
Net external Torque, the energy is not conserved as an external force is ac=
ting through a distance, in particular the tension applied to the bottom of=
the sphere, additionally the PE due to gravity of the sphere increases as =
the sphere is collapsed
so not Tom-AYE-toe, Tom-AHH-toe.daveOn Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, david kardelis &=
lt;dkardelis@gmail.com> wrote:
<=
div class=3D"h5">On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at=
11:54 AM, Scott Thomas =
wrote:

Conservation of rotational energy, or conservation of angular momentum=
?=A0 Tom-AYE-toe, Tom-AHH-toe.=A0 ;-)
=A0



--0003255765ae4052b304950ad6d3--

From tap-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu Sun Nov 14 22:30:10 2010

Back