Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:37:53 -0500

Author: "Cliff Bettis"

Subject: Re: give the BBC some static

Post:

In fairness, it's probably not easy to get much practicle experience with
electrostatics in Britain. Besides it sounds more like a case of SHC
(Spontaneous Human Confusion) to me.

Cliff
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Sturm"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: give the BBC some static


> The Australian ABC news too deserves static, but only 75% as much:
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1461751.htm
>
> It does look like the Brits are trying to once again inflate the evidence,
> and perhaps start an invasion based on these lies, searching for the extra
> 10,000 volts! I'm sure PM Blair will soon launch a joint operation with
> GW Bush to take this evil
> jacket out of the hands of the operatives of Oz!
>
> tap-l@listproc.appstate.edu on Thursday, October 20, 2005 at 2:59 PM -0500
> wrote:
>>How can the BBC print such nonsense? It's not the National
>>Enquirer! -- Wolfgang
>>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4252692.stm
>>
>
>
>
> ============================================
> David E G Sturm
> --Physics & Astronomy Instructional Laboratories
> --Bennett Hall Lecture Demonstration Facilities
> Dept of Physics & Astronomy -- University of Maine
> 5709 Bennett Hall -- Orono ME 04469-5709
> sturmde@maine.edu -- 1.207.581.1241
> ============================================
From gkarshner@stmarytx.edu Thu Oct 20 17:43:35 2005

Back