Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 15:40:27 -0400
Author: Sam Sampere
Subject: Re: video camera
I bought a AA battery holder from Radio Shack for $0.79. I've been using the
same set of batteries for 2 years now.
Dale Stille wrote:
> Yes, it is. The resolution of the camera is a little low, but for
> applications like moving frames of reference or rotating frames and
> motion, you can't beat a wireless. The nice thing about these is that
> they are cheap enough that you can buy and dedicate a camera to each
> application that you may have. Make sure you get the battery pack for the
> camera......when I bought mine, this was a seperate item, but what you
> really need to make this a true "wireless".
> Dale Stille
> U of Iowa
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Jerry DiMarco wrote:
> > Tappers,
> > Is the X-10 wireless video camera the one we were talking about a few
> > months ago? If so, are those of you who bought it happy with its
> > performance? It's getting close to the end of the FY, time to spend the
> > remainder of my budget. Thanks for your recommendations...
> > Jerry
> > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> > Jerry DiMarco
> > Manager of Lecture Demonstrations and Instructional Labs
> > Montana State Univ., Physics Dept.
> > Bozeman, MT
> > Our Motto: "We don't use anything the way it was meant to be used."